Legal Opinion

Reidy Terminal, Inc. v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 30, 1995No. 77314PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

This is a petition for review from a decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) denying Reidy Terminal, Inc.’s (Reidy) request for a refund of surcharges paid into the underground storage tank insurance fund under § 319.132.1, RSMo.1 We hold that the surcharges paid constitute an impermissible burden on interstate commerce in violation of the commerce clause of the United States Constitution.

I

Reidy owns a tugboat refueling facility on the bank of the Mississippi River near St. Louis. Reidy receives its diesel fuel from barges. It pumps the fuel to an above-*541ground…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Evansville-Vanderburgh Airport Authority District v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. County of KentSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Leggett v. Missouri State Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. President Riverboat Casino-Missouri, Inc. v. Missouri Gaming CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  2. Luke v. Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Rees Oil Co. & Rees Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. River Fleets, Inc. v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API