Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Intercontinental Hotels Group Resources, Inc. & Hotel

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided February 8, 2012No. 5:10-CV-24-REWPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT E. WIER, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, Intercontinental Hotels Group Resources, *664Inc. and Hotel d/b/a Holiday Inn Lexington, Kentucky, move the Court for summary judgment. DE # 49 (Motion). Third-Party Defendant, Bulls Eye Lawn and Landscape, responded in favor (DE #52), Plaintiffs responded in opposition (DE #54), and Defendants subsequently replied (DE # 55). Having reviewed the filings and full record under the required standards, the Court DENIES Holiday Inn’s motion for summary judgment (DE #49).

I. Relevant Background1

T…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Jerry Lorenzo Bass, A/K/A Afif Abdul R. Karriem v. Kevin Robinson James LashbrookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garrity v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2012
  2. Ames v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
  3. Frazier v. Total Renal Care, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  4. Jouett v. Circle K Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API