Legal Opinion

Barons v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from, Cloud District Court. The opinion contains a statement of the facts. Plaintiff Barons brings here for review a certain judgment rendered against him and for defendant Anderson, in the district court, on March 4, 1886.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Holt, C.:

The plaintiff made application to the judge of the Cloud district court for an alternative writ *400of mandamus against the defendant, which was granted, and the writ issued. Afterward, upon a trial, it was adjudged by the district court that a peremptory writ of mandamus be refused. The plaintiff below, the plaintiff in error here, asks for a review and reversal of the judgment.

There was quite an amount of evidence introduced, and on some questions there is a serious conflict, but from the testimony, we believe these facts are fairly established: This plaintiff was plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Briggs v. TyeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Freeman v. Wyandotte Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API