Legal Opinion

Brown v. Syson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 28, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4424PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

In view of the Arizona Supreme Court decision in Ryan v. State, 134 Ariz. 308, 656 P.2d 597 (1982), we must reverse the trial court’s granting of the defense motion for summary judgment. In Ryan, the supreme court expressly overruled the doctrine of immunity expressed in Massengill v. Yuma County, 104 Ariz. 518, 456 P.2d 376 (1969). The court stated:

“We shall no longer engage in the speculative exercise of determining whether the tort-feasor has a general duty to the injured party, which spells no recovery, or if he had a specific individual duty which means recovery.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Massengill v. Yuma CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Butler v. BogdanovichNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Benson v. KutschWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Carstens v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Diaz v. Magma Copper Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Wood v. Milin.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API