Legal Opinion

Heral v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 13, 1991No. CA 90-115PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elizabeth W. Danielson, Judge.

Gary Heral, d/b/a/ Heral Enterprises, Inc., appeals from a judgment in favor of appellees in an unlawful detainer action. We affirm.

On June 1,1979, Howard and Margaret Halley leased some commercial real property to appellant for a term of ten years for $1,200 per month. The lease contained the following statement: “Lessee is hereby granted two options to renew this Lease for a term of five (5) years each, terms and conditions to be negotiable but not to exceed the annual cost-of-living index.” On May 4, 1989, appellant sent a letter to appellees, the Halleys’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Warmack v. Merchants Nat. Bank of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Lesser-Goldman Cotton Co. v. FletcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. Hatch v. Scott, Admx.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. Gorman v. RatliffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Johnson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keith Jorgensen's, Inc. v. Ogden City Mall Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  2. Troutman Oil Co. v. LoneCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Harvill v. BevansCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Southway Corp. v. Metropolitan Realty & Development Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Guy Maris Trust v. TruemperCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API