Fogg v. Hall
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
In this action of assumpsit on account annexed to the writ, plaintiff seeks to recover a balance of $743.10, for “the production,” between September 1, 1933, and July 1, 1934, of 66,670 quarts of milk, at 4% cents a quart; the general issue having been pleaded, there was joinder in issue. The jury decided for plaintiff, awarding $720.78.
Whether the verdict is against law and evidence, and whether the damages assessed are excessive, is raised for review by motion for new trial. Exceptions were not preserved.
There is, on the record, no question as to the total amount of milk produced and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ryan v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Fuller v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
- Lamson & Goodnow Manufacturing Co. v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Bell v. DoyleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920
- Anderson v. Standard Granite Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Inniss v. Methot Buick-Opel, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Emerson v. SweetSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Larsen v. ZimmermanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
- Farina v. SHERIDAN CORPORATIONSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.