Legal Opinion

De Hon v. Gordon

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided August 14, 1924No. A-330Published

1Opinion of the Court

RITCHIE, District Judge.

An important feature of the testimony is the sharp conflict in certain statements of the witnesses. More impressive to my mind is the total lack of ordinary caution displayed by all the parties to the original agreement. It must have been known to most, if not all, of them that grubstake agreements have been a fruitful source of litigation ever since mining began in the Western states. Nevertheless they relied upon an oral discussion at a meeting of the parties for a contract as to the work that was to be done by the defendant Isaacs with the grubstake of $1,500. A few…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. LeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Prince v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Moritz v. LavelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Morrow v. MatthewIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Costello v. ScottNevada Supreme Court · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API