Legal Opinion

Walter Dartland v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Sergio Pereira

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 27, 1989No. 88-5273PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge:

Sergio Pereira appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity in a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983. After reviewing the relevant first amendment law in the light of the specifics of this case, we reverse.

Sergio Pereira, the Dade County Manager, proposed the merger of the Dade County Consumer Advocate’s Office into the county’s Office of Consumer Protection. In an interview about the proposed merger, Walter Dartland, the Dade County Consumer Advocate, told a reporter for the Miami Herald that Pereira…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Busby v. City of OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Lassiter v. Alabama A & M UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Sheldon L. Wulf v. The City of Wichita, Gene Denton, and Richard LamunyonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. McGreevy v. StroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Post v. City of Fort LauderdaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API