Legal Opinion

Hivick v. Hemme

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 16, 1926No. 16158PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, O.

Parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court. The Producers Lead & Zinc Company, a corporation, had constructed a mill for mining lead and zinc on its property, plaintiff being an officer and director, and defendant a stockholder. On May 19, 1919, the company being largely indebted, the directors passed a resolution providing that subscription be circulated among the stockholders:

“To pay off certain indebtedness due the McNeal Machine Company and the Landreth Machine Company, and insurance and other incidental indebtedness, the principal part of which is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Speidel v. HenriciSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Riddle v. WhitehillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Comingor v. Louisville Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  5. Mason v. MacFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. McGann v. McGannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Robinson v. KirbieCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Leedy v. Ellis County Fair Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Mothersead v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API