Legal Opinion

Flynn v Korneffel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1996No. 99238, Calendar No. 7Published

1Opinion of the Court

547 N.W.2d 249 (1996)

451 Mich. 186

Wendell C. FLYNN and Margaret Ann Flynn, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Curtis G. KORNEFFEL and Maureen A. Korneffel, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 99238, Calendar No. 7.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued December 7, 1995.

Decided April 30, 1996.

Philip A. Gillis, Clinton Township, for plaintiffs.

Sean P. Kavanagh, Livonia, and Murphy, Brenton & Spagnuolo, P.C. by Frederick J. Griffith, III, Lansing, for defendants.

OPINION

RILEY, Justice.

We granted leave to determine whether a writ of restitution issued by the 33rd District Court in this land contract forfeiture…

Also in this document: Dissent · Levin; Dissent · Cavanagh.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Beason v. BeasonMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Gruskin v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gordon Grossman Building Co. v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Rothenberg v. FollmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Barnard v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API