Legal Opinion

Flores v. Brimex Ltd. Partnership

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided October 6, 1999No. 04-98-00958-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

This is a restricted appeal of a post-answer default judgment. The appellants, Caroline Haggard Flores, Santos M. Flores, M.D., S.M. Flores Medical Clinic, Inc. and Medical Lab (“Flores Defendants”), assert one issue in their brief, contending that the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to support the judgment. We hold that the evidence is legally insufficient and reverse the trial court’s judgment as against the Flores Defendants. However, in the interest of justice, we remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Norman Communications v. Texas Eastman Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Grierson v. Parker Energy Partners 1984-ICourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In the Interest of E.K.N.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Doty-Jabbaar v. Dallas County Child Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  3. Cordero v. American Home Assurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
  4. Adin Garcia and Cathy Garcia v. River City Federal Credit Union and Scott M. Noel, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
  5. Barry M. Beller v. Fry Roofing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API