Legal Opinion

Harris v. Acts Syrene Apartments

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 13, 2022No. 4:22-cv-00405Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GAITHER S. HARRIS, 7 Case No. 22-cv-00405-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE 9 REVIEW UNDER

28 U.S.C. § 1915

ACTS SYRENE APARTMENTS, 10 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR Defendant. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 11 Dkt. No. 3 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff in this action is proceeding pro se. The Court has granted Plaintiff’s application to 16 proceed in forma pauperis and therefore is required to review the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s 17 complaint to determine whether it satisfies 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). For the reasons…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API