Legal Opinion
18 International, Ltd. v. Interstate Express, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 17, 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David B. Saxe, J.
May a motion to admit an out-of-State attorney pro hac vice to appear for a client in a particular litigation pursuant to section 602.2 (a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR 602.2 [a]), be defeated on the ground that the moving party would not suffer prejudice or hardship if it was required to be represented solely by New York counsel?
Counsel to the plaintiff, 18 International, Ltd., has made an application on behalf of the coplaintiff Arthur Winer, Inc., to have Allen L. Shulman, Esq., admitted pro hac vice…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spivak v. SachsNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Jemzura v. McCueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Jemzura v. BenenatiNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. H.K. Porter Co. v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PavlikOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Largeteau v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. Bing, New York County Courts1985
- Disciplinary Counsel v. PavlikOhio Supreme Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.