Legal Opinion

Harold Polite v. Donald Diehl and Walter Lofstrom, as Individuals and as Officers of the McKeesport Police Department. Harold Polite v. William Rendulic

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 31, 1974No. 72-1770Published

1Opinion of the Court

507 F.2d 119

Harold POLITE, Appellant,

v.

Donald DIEHL and Walter Lofstrom, as Individuals and as

Officers of the McKeesport Police Department.

Harold POLITE, Appellant,

v.

William RENDULIC et al.

Nos. 72-1770, 72-2013.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) May 22, 1973,

Resubmitted En Banc Sept. 13, 1974.

Decided Dec. 31, 1974.

Irving M. Portnoy, Harry J. Gruener, Richard B. Springer, Litman, Litman, Harris & Specter, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

Daniel J. Weis, Weis & Weis, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API