Legal Opinion

Barth v. A. & B. Schuster Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1923No. Civil No. 2080PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Action for money had and received. The facts out of which this action arose are agreed to by the parties, and, essentially, are as follows: Appellee, A. & B.. Schuster Company, a corporation, carrying on a general merchandise business, some time after September 25, 1918, brought suit against Manuel Gonzales and wife on a past-due promissory note for $455.50, and attached certain real property as security to pay any judgment that might be obtained. In due time judgment was entered against the Gonzales, and the attachment lien foreclosed. Defendant Jacob Hamblin, who was the sheriff of Apache…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Merrill v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Copper Belle Mining Co. v. GleesonArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Dresser v. KronbergSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Webb v. Crane Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Watson Construction Co. v. Amfac Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. Ayala v. OlaizCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. Henry v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. Albert Steinfeld & Co. v. TewArizona Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API