Legal Opinion

Janell, Inc. v. Woods

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1980No. C-790709PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause came on to be heard upon an appeal from the Hamilton County Municipal Court.

Defendant-appellant, Fox Berry Enterprises, Inc. (Fox Berry), appeals from a judgment rendered against it for $1,200 plus interest and costs, claiming that plaintiff-appellee, Janell, Inc., was not entitled to judgment because it did not comply with the Ohio Mechanics’ Lien Law. We affirm.

The language of the single assignment asserts error in failing to direct a verdict in favor of Fox Berry at the close of all the evidence. Since the trial was before a referee without a jury, defendant made the wrong…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Altimari v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Blewett v. SullivanOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Brownell, Keilmeier & Co. v. HarshOhio Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Software Clearing House, Inc. v. Intrak, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Bank One, Dayton, N.A. v. DoughmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Baker v. ConlanOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Bhatti v. SinghOhio Court of Appeals · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API