Janell, Inc. v. Woods
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This cause came on to be heard upon an appeal from the Hamilton County Municipal Court.
Defendant-appellant, Fox Berry Enterprises, Inc. (Fox Berry), appeals from a judgment rendered against it for $1,200 plus interest and costs, claiming that plaintiff-appellee, Janell, Inc., was not entitled to judgment because it did not comply with the Ohio Mechanics’ Lien Law. We affirm.
The language of the single assignment asserts error in failing to direct a verdict in favor of Fox Berry at the close of all the evidence. Since the trial was before a referee without a jury, defendant made the wrong…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Altimari v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Blewett v. SullivanOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
- Brownell, Keilmeier & Co. v. HarshOhio Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by19 opinions
- Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Software Clearing House, Inc. v. Intrak, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Bank One, Dayton, N.A. v. DoughmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Baker v. ConlanOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Bhatti v. SinghOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.