Gill v. Falkowski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Mahoney, P. J., and Staley, Jr., J.,
dissent and vote to affirm in the following memorandum by Staley, Jr., J. Staley, Jr., J. (dissenting). The majority opinion speculates that the jury could have reasonably and rationally concluded that the defendant, Frank Falkowksi, knew that a loaded gun was in his room with a sufficient amount of time to warn those present as to its dangers. We disagree, and are of the opinion that plaintiff failed to produce evidence which would prove how the gun came to be in Frank Falkowski’s room, or that he knew of the gun’s presence in the room prior to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rider v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Payne v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Napiearlski v. PickeringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Ship v. FridenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Yusko v. RemizonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.