Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. McLaughlin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1906No. 14,184PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

EPPERSON, O.

From January, 1900, until January, 1902, the defendant in error, McLaughlin, was the county treasurer of Lancaster county, and at the beginning of his term appointed one Edgar Waugh an assistant in his office. Waugh was required by his principal to execute the bond herein sued on, with the plaintiff in error as surety, whereupon he entered upon the duties of the position, and was authorized to sign and issue official tax receipts in the name of his principal, and in fact to perform all the official duties of the county treasurer except to sign checks. The bond fixes the maximum…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paxton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Consolidated Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1895
  3. Holt County v. ScottNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PoetkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Southern Surety Co. v. KinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Lyons v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. County of Platte v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1946
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Lake State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API