Legal Opinion
Lilly v. Lilly
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 19, 1982No. Civ. 62595PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the superior court denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside judgment and specially set case for trial after judicial arbitration. We reverse.
The only statement of facts before us is that of appellant, since respondent has not filed a brief with this court, after a request to do so pursuant to California Rules of Court rule 17(b). Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of such rule, we accept appellant’s statement of facts as correctly stating the events hereinafter set forth. (See, Shapiro v. Cahill (1963) 219 Cal.App.2d 772,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Redevelopment Agency v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Isthmian Lines, Inc. v. Schirmer Stevedoring Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Mattox v. IsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mentzer v. HardoinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Koll Hancock Torrey Pines v. Biophysica Foundation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989