Legal Opinion
McKelton v. Bruno
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 27, 1970No. 3949 OriginalPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
Appellant, a tenant who has been sued for possession of premises, has now been permitted to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs. McKelton v. Bruno, U.S.App.D.C (No. 22,628 decided February 17, 1970). Relying on Lee v. Habib, 424 F. 2d 891 (D.C.Cir., decided January 22, 1970), he now requests that a transcript of' the proceedings in the trial court be prepared at the expense of the United States. In his motion he informs us that the attorney who represented him at trial is no longer in the city and that he has obtained a new lawyer. We are also told that many…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Leroy Jefferson v. United States of America, UndocketedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wolpe v. PoretskyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neuman v. NeumanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Neuman v. NeumanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977