Legal Opinion

Kun v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 16, 2005No. 04-76629PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Albert M. Kun appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s decision for the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“CIR”) on Kun’s petition challenging the notice of determination for tax years 1995 through 1999. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482. We review decisions of the Tax Court under the same standard as civil bench trials in district court. Milenbach v. Comm’r; 318 F.3d 924, 930 (9th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we review de novo a Tax Court’s conclusions of law. Boyd Gaming Corp. v. Comm’r, 177 F.3d 1096, 1098 (9th Cir.1999). We review for abuse of discretion the decision…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Merlin Hansen Dolores Hansen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Robert C. Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Estate of Nail v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Angle v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API