Legal Opinion

Friedman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1986No. 71415PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

Hirsch Friedman appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and its exclusive agent, David Chandler, on his claim of fraudulent misrepresentation.

Appellant obtained a policy of automobile insurance from appellee State Farm (hereinafter appellee) in 1973. The policy provided for $10,000 in personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. By deposition and affidavit, appellant stated that between 1973 and 1982 appellee’s agent, appellee Chandler (hereinafter Chandler), represented to appellant that the policy…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Enfinger v. International Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Thomas v. Union Fidelity Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. A-Larms, Inc. v. Alarms Device Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Marett Properties, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Roach v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Nodvin v. Plantation Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Davis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API