In Re Petition of Dormitzer
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
The petitioner complains because he was not allowed to file an answer to the return of the sheriff. He filed a paper denominated a demurrer which in reality went to the merits of the issues joined by the return to the writ. It is optional with the trial court to permit a litigant to file an answer after having demurred to a pleading. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the writ after deciding the issues raised by the demurrer.
The petitioner further contends that the favor granted Edmunson by the Governor was an unconditional pardon. This contention cannot be sustained.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. FinchOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Clifford v. HellerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
- State ex rel. Stafford v. HawkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
- Matter of BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ex parte BlackCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Haugen v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. DirksenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1940