Legal Opinion

State v. Dirksen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 21, 1989No. 88CR-0052; CA A48858Published

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. The court suspended imposition of sentence and put him on probation for two years. His only claim of error is that the court abused its discretion by imposing certain conditions of probation. We affirm.

There are two threshold issues. The state first argues that, because defendant pleaded guilty, the issues that he can raise are limited by ORS 138.050 and, because an order of probation is not a sentence, State v. Carmickle, 307 Or 1, 762 P2d 290 (1988), the order is not appealable or reviewable. That contention is disposed of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CarmickleOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. DonovanOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Moore v. FloydOregon Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Washington v. ClelandOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. In Re Petition of DormitzerOregon Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API