Moore v. . Shaw
New York Court of Appeals
The nature of the appeal and the facts appear sufficiently in the opinion. (Reported below, 15 Hun, 428.)
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the first judicial department, affirming an order of Special Term, denying a motion to vacate a judgment for deficiency, upon the ground that the report of the referee, who made the sale, was not confirmed, nor any application for a personal judgment against the defendant made. The court below held that a judgment for deficiency under section 167 of the Code, was provided for in the judgment of foreclosure, and that no further application need be made to the court, nor any further notice given to the defendant. We do…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Feiber Realty Corp. v. AbelNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. Van BokkelenNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Bankers Trust Co. v. 1 East 88th Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Bondy v. Aronson & List Realties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In Re the Appointment of a Committee of the Person & Property of KalthoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.