Legal Opinion
Bondy v. Aronson & List Realties, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 7, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Plaintiffs, appellants, are mortgagees; defendant, appellant, Aronson and List Realties, Inc., is mortgagor and former owner; defendant Worbass is the present owner and in possession of the premises described in the complaint, and has assumed and agreed to pay the mortgage. Thus defendant Worbass is the principal debtor and the defendant, appellant, Aronson and List Realties, Inc., the surety for the payment of the mortgage indebtedness. (Hyde v. Miller, 45 App. Div. 396; affd., 168 N. Y. 590.) Plaintiffs, appellants, have prosecuted this action to foreclose their mortgage to judgment, sale,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morris v. . MorangeNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Moore v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Hyde v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Hyde v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Brown v. FaileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dulberg v. EbenhartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- National City Bank v. GelfertNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Cassia Corp. v. North Hills Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Forest Hill Cemetery Ass'n v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Syracuse Trust Co. v. CoreyNew York Supreme Court · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.