People v. Duenas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the court’s refusal to provide simultaneous translation from English to Spanish during pretrial proceedings violated his rights to effective assistance of counsel and confrontation of witnesses under the US and NY Constitutions.
Aware that the defendant did not understand English, the court appointed an official interpreter at arraignment. An official interpreter was present at all pretrial proceedings. No objection was raised as to the manner or extent of translation until the second day of a suppression hearing. Indeed, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. De ArmasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. HatzipavlouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. PellorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. AlbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. StableAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989