Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Hargadine-Mckittrick Dry Goods Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1916No. 7333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the District Court, Atoka County; J. II. Linebaugh, Judge. Action by the Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Company against A. D. Phillips. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BRUNSON, C.

For convenience the parties to this suit will be designated here as they were in the trial court.

On the 3rd day of December, A. D. 1914, the plaintiff filed its action against the defendant, alleging its cause of action on four promissory notes dated May 18. A. D. 1914; the first one becoming due on the 1st day of October, A. IX 1914, and tbe last one on the 1st day of November, A. D. 1914, and at. the time of the filing of this suit all of said notes were due and unpaid. Thereafter on the 23rd day of December, A. D. 1914, the defendant filed his answer to said petition,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Kimball v. ConnorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
  3. First Nat. Bank of Lawton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Brown v. MasseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Cobb v. CharterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1865

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ada v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Gooldy v. J. B. Klein Iron & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Hogue v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API