United States v. Ware
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FERGUSON, Senior Judge:
Appellant complains that the convening authority who “reversed” the military judge’s dismissal of the charge1 against appellant on the ground of denial of speedy trial2 and who “directed [trial] to proceed,” acted without lawful power to do so, a claim with which we agree. As a consequence, we reverse and dismiss.
After the trial judge had granted the appellant’s motion to dismiss the charge, which motion was predicated upon an alleged denial of the appellant’s right to a speedy disposition of that charge against him, the Government appealed the trial…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. SissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. MerskySupreme Court of the United States · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. GrafUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. SuzukiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- McPhail v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. HeardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.