Legal Opinion

State v. Hartman

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided May 29, 1991No. 09-90-081 CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

The State of Texas appeals the granting of a motion for new trial. Jerome Hartman was charged by information with driving while intoxicated. He pleaded guilty to the court without an attorney. The trial court assessed punishment at one year’s confinement in the Orange County Jail probated for one year with mandatory enrollment in a DWI educational program, and a $300 fine. Hartman filed a motion for new trial on the grounds that his plea was not freely, voluntarily and intelligently entered. After a hearing, the trial court granted the motion for new trial. The state…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Limuel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. McGuire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Bass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Shepherd v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  5. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fimberg v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  2. In re S.L.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. State v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Courtney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
  5. Courtney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API