Legal Opinion

Courtney v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided April 11, 2001No. 09-00-374 CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

39 S.W.3d 732 (2001)

Tommy Layne COURTNEY, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 09-00-374 CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Submitted March 2, 2001.

Decided April 11, 2001.

John Henry Tatum, II, Lufkin, for appellant.

Clyde M. Herrington, District Attorney, Albert J. Charanza, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, Lufkin, for the State.

Before WALKER, C.J., BURGESS, and GAULTNEY, JJ.

OPINION

GAULTNEY, Justice.

The single issue in this case is ineffective assistance of counsel, which appellant Tommy Layne Courtney claims rendered his plea involuntary. A guilty plea is not voluntarily or…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Ex Parte TorresCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Ex Parte MorrowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API