In re the Accounting of Clark
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hazleton, S.
In the construction phase of this proceeding, it appears that in the several trusts set up in Clauses B, D and F, of her will, the testatrix provided that1 ‘ from the income and so much of the principal of the trust fund as may be needed or required from time to time (it being my expectation that the income will be insufficient for the purposes specified) ”, there is to be paid each beneficiary 11 an annuity or total net sum of five thousand * * * dollars in every year ”.
Although the petitioners have paid to the beneficiaries annually the sum of $5,000, they now find on their…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matter of KohlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- In re the Estate of ShupackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- United States Trust Co. v. . SoherNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- In re KohlerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
- In re KohlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of BeckerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
- In re the Estate of BerthetNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
- In re the Accounting of United States Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1956
- In re the Accounting of WadsworthNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
- In re the Estate of HuntNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969