Fry v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DIXON, Chief Judge.
Appeal from an order denying a Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., motion to vacate a conviction and twenty-year sentence for assault with intent to rob with malice aforethought. The movant claims denial of effective assistance of counsel. After an ev-identiary hearing on the motion, relief was denied.
Ineffective assistance of counsel is specified as 1) failing to consult with appellant *251concerning the defense of the case; 2) causing appellant to testify in his own behalf and against his wishes; 3) failing to locate a critical witness for the defense; and 4) failing to apprise appellant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holbert v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Babcock v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- State v. WoolbrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- State v. BobbittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Nero v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007