Legal Opinion

Fry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1973No. KCD 26257PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Chief Judge.

Appeal from an order denying a Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., motion to vacate a conviction and twenty-year sentence for assault with intent to rob with malice aforethought. The movant claims denial of effective assistance of counsel. After an ev-identiary hearing on the motion, relief was denied.

Ineffective assistance of counsel is specified as 1) failing to consult with appellant *251concerning the defense of the case; 2) causing appellant to testify in his own behalf and against his wishes; 3) failing to locate a critical witness for the defense; and 4) failing to apprise appellant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holbert v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Babcock v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  4. State v. WoolbrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. State v. BobbittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Nero v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API