Legal Opinion

Holbert v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 10, 1969No. 53947PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOCKARD, Commissioner.

Bertrand J. Holbert has appealed from the order of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his motion filed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 27.26, V.A. M.R., without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand.

Appellant was convicted by a jury on February 3, 1966, of attempting to bribe an officer in violation of § 558.080, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S., and his punishment was assessed at imprisonment for five years. At the trial defendant was represented by an employed attorney. On February 7, 1966, defendant was granted thirty additional days within which to file a…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Charles Robert O'Malley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  2. Robert Louis Porter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. State v. HolbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Joseph Morris Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. Horace Edward Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ScottCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. State v. CaffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. Steel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Hall v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. McCrary v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API