Legal Opinion
Haller v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 13, 2001No. Civ. 01-759-JEPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KING, District Judge.
Magistrate John Jelderks filed his Findings and Recommendation (# 11) on August 1, 2001 (the “F & R”) and referred it to me on September 18, 2001. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).
When either party objects to any portion of the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate’s report. See 28 U.S.C § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of Williams-Moore v. Alliance One Receivables Management, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Orthopedic Specialists of New Jersey PA v. Horizon Blue Cross/Blue ShieldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- N.G. v. Downey Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Van Horn v. Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue ShieldDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007