Legal Opinion

Westingbouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1958No. Appeals, Nos. 34 and 38PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

Claimants and the employer, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, have appealed from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. The board affirmed the referee’s decision, refused compensation to claimants for the period of a work stoppage determined to be a strike, and granted compensation for the period of the work stoppage determined to have been converted into a lockout.1 The claimants contend that the entire work stoppage was due to a lockout; Westinghouse contends that the entire work stoppage was a strike.

Claimants are members of three locals of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. TorquatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Hogan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Burger Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. P. McGraw Wool Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of BeviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. High v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Hoffman v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Hoffman v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Klimkosky v. KlimkoskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Burkes v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API