United States v. Hughes
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
1ConcurrenceSnyder, Senior Judge
I concur only with Parts I, II-B and D, III-B, XI, XII, and XIII of the majority opinion. Otherwise, I concur only in the result, and I provide my bases for why I believe the findings and the sentence, as reassessed, should be affirmed. The majority opinion disposes of two critical issues which are issues of first impression in the Air Force. In the residual hearsay area, the majority opinion, sub silentio, expands the law to allow the admission of a hearsay declaration by an unavailable child witness found incompetent to testify truthfully. Further, we struggle to replace the legislature’s…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.