Legal Opinion

State v. Bouchles

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 8, 1983PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

Defendant George Bouchles was charged by indictment with trafficking in a Schedule W drug (cocaine), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1108 (Pamph.1982). In its interlocutory appeal pursuant to 15 M.R.S.A. § 2115-A (1980 & Supp.1982-1983), the State asserts that the Superior Court (Androscoggin County) erred in suppressing evidence seized by police officers during a warrantless search of defendant’s van. The evidence suppressed was the contents of several plastic bags found in a box under the front seat of the van.1 The Superior Court’s order, entered on March 10, 1982, was premised on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Potts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. People v. HelmquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. State v. UllringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  5. State v. TarantinoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API