De Milt v. Hill
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from Suffolk county court. Action by Henry R. He Milt against Sarah Hill and Francis C. Hill to foreclose a mortgage. There was judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.
This action was brought for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The premises first described in the complaint were conveyed by the plaintiff to the defendant Sarah Hill, and this mortgage, of even date with the conveyance, was given to secure the full amount of the purchase money; but it included other premises, which are secondly described in the complaint, which were not so conveyed by the plaintiff. The property so conveyed by the plaintiff was a mill site, and was purchased to be utilized as a water power in connection with an electric light company, which was to be thereafter organized. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The Kingston Bank v. . EltingeNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Long v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Taylor v. FleetNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Taylor v. FleetNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Tallman v. GreenThe Superior Court of New York City · 1850
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morris v. CourtneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Kaston v. Nathan Zimmerman & George Orlove & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Munkres v. McCaskillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Creamer v. PeshkinNew York Supreme Court · 1913
- Kaston v. Nathan Zimmerman & George Orlove & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920