Legal Opinion

Wolff v. Madden

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1893No. 854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J.

It is not necessary for us to notice appellant’s objections to respondent’s contention that the relation assumed by appellant towards the Midland Lumber Company was that of an incoming partner, for assuming, for the purposes of this decision, that the jury correctly found upon that proposition, we are unable to find anything in the record which would bind him as an incoming partner to pay debts of the partnership which were contracted prior to his connection with the partnership. It would be a useless task for this court to discuss the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Huttig Sash & Door Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Wine Packing Corp. of Cal. v. VossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Citizens Bank of Massachusetts v. Parham-Woodman Medical AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API