Legal Opinion

Coe v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1962No. Civ. 19064PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment after jury verdict in favor of defendants, and purports to appeal from the order denying new trial.

Questions Presented

1. Alleged error in instructions given:(a) Presumption of use of due care by defendants;(b) section 575, subdivision (a), Vehicle Code (now § 22451, subd. (a));(c) failure to instruct on contributory negligence.

2. Other instructions.

3. Exclusion of statement of Mrs. Winther.

4. Cross-examination of Highway Patrol officer as to Fresno City Police report.

Evidence

Plaintiff was the passenger in an automobile which was struck at a railroad crossing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gigliotti v. NunesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Powell v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Ford v. CHESLEY TRANSPORTATION CO. INC.California Court of Appeal · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Wigodsky v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Rice v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Fruitridge Fire District v. JudgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Brown v. ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API