Legal Opinion

State v. Simpson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 1, 2016No. AC38643PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.

Following the trial court's acceptance of his guilty plea under the Alford doctrine, 1 the defendant, Earl Simpson, was convicted of murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-54a (a) and 53a-8. 2 The defendant now appeals from the judgment, claiming that: (1) on the basis of facts and circumstances that were apparent to the court at the time of the plea and which undermined a finding that the defendant understood the nature of the charge at issue, the court abused its discretion by denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing and, in the alternative, abused its…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. State v. FaradaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  2. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  3. Adkins v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Green v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  5. Simpson v. ButricksDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API