Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 18, 1995No. 93-2586PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MICKLE, Judge.

Jeffrey E. Roberts (Appellant) appeals from a judgment and sentence on the ground that the trial court violated his state and federal constitutional rights 1) by failing to renew its offer of counsel at his jury trial and 2) by permitting Appellant to represent himself at trial without conducting an adequate inquiry into his waiver of counsel. We are constrained to reverse the judgment and sentence and remand for a new trial.

Appellant was charged by information with an aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. With the jury present in proceedings on May 14, 1993 before Judge # 1,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Lamb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API