Smith v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
Appellants raise the issue whether they knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived their right to counsel. We affirm the waiver as to appellant Gary Smith, but reverse as to Otis Smith.
When Gary Smith was queried regarding his waiver of counsel the following colloquy ensued:
THE COURT: Gary Phillip Smith. And Otis Dean Smith. Are they Co-Defendants?
MR. HUSBANDS: Yes ma’am.
MR. GARY SMITH: Yes ma’am.
THE COURT: Is Mr. Otis Dean Smith present in the courtroom?
MR. GARY SMITH: Your Honor,, my brother is presently snowed in in Northern California. ... I have filed upon his behalf…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Muhammad v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Hart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Ramon A. Osorio v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025