Legal Opinion

Callaham v. Childers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 6, 1940No. 29299PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.

This is an original proceeding wherein petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the respondent district judge to certify his disqualification in a case pending in respondent’s court wherein petitioner’s wife is plaintiff and petitioner is defendant. That case involves divorce and the distribution of between thirty and fifty thousand dollars worth of property.

Petitioner first filed his affidavit and application for disqualification, in the district court, as required by law. He charged that the attorney for plaintiff therein was the judge’s son, and had been retained by plaintiff on a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte EllisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. State Ex Rel. Mayo v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. State Ex Rel. v. FullertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. State Ex Rel. Garrett v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Son v. LinebaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. East Maine Township Community Ass'n v. Pioneer Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  3. Sadberry v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. Bennett v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Arbuckle Simpson Aquifer Protection Federation of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API