Legal Opinion
Arbuckle Simpson Aquifer Protection Federation of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 23, 2013No. 111,381PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCombs, J.
1
PROCEDURE FOR MAXIMUM ANNUAL YIELD DETERMINATIONS
11 The proceedings in question concern the Arbuckle Simpson Aquifer Maximum Annual Yield (MAY) determination, made by OWRB on March 13, 2012. Pursuant to 82 ©.S.2011 $ 1020.6, once the OWRB has set a tentative maximum annual yield for a groundwater basin or subbasin, it is required to call and hold hearings at centrally located places where any interested parties shall have the right to present evidence in support or opposition to the determination of the *1268OWRB.1 These hearings are to be conducted pursuant to Article II of the Administrative…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Draper v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Texas County Irrigation & Water Resources Ass'n v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- PRICE v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PAWNEE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Coates v. FallinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Green v. Oklahoma Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- IN RE APPLICATION OF GREEN FOR ADMISSION TO OKLA. BAR ASSOC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- PRICE v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PAWNEE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016