Bonilla v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Luis Ruiz Bonilla pled guilty to dealing in cocaine, and the trial court sentenced him to the advisory term of thirty years. Bonilla now appeals, arguing that his sentence is inappropriate. The State responds that Bonilla waived the right to appeal because his plea agreement contains a provision that he waived the right to appellate review of his sentence under Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B). However, because the trial court made confusing remarks at the guilty plea hearing indicating that Bonilla "may" have waived the right to appeal and then advised Bonilla of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Childress v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Reid v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
3Cited by19 opinions
- Holloway v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Todd J. Crider v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Bowling v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- William M. Starcher v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.