Legal Opinion

Bonilla v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 2009No. 20A05-0902-CR-85PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Luis Ruiz Bonilla pled guilty to dealing in cocaine, and the trial court sentenced him to the advisory term of thirty years. Bonilla now appeals, arguing that his sentence is inappropriate. The State responds that Bonilla waived the right to appeal because his plea agreement contains a provision that he waived the right to appellate review of his sentence under Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B). However, because the trial court made confusing remarks at the guilty plea hearing indicating that Bonilla "may" have waived the right to appeal and then advised Bonilla of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Childress v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Reid v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Holloway v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Todd J. Crider v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Bowling v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. William M. Starcher v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API