Roy Charles Williams, Sr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-appellant Roy Charles Williams, Sr., has taken this appeal from the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He was tried for the crimes of conspiracy and possession of narcotics in the Northern District of Ohio, and now alleges that venue there was improper, violating his constitutional right to a trial in the “district wherein the crime shall have been committed.” U.S.Const. amend. VI. The district court denied the § 2255 motion, ruling that petitioner’s claim of improper venue is not cognizable in a habeas…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Johnston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. MobleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Lee WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Burnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2003
- United States v. OsborneDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
- Alvarez-Cuan v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.