Legal Opinion

Roy Charles Williams, Sr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 23, 1978No. 77-3278PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-appellant Roy Charles Williams, Sr., has taken this appeal from the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He was tried for the crimes of conspiracy and possession of narcotics in the Northern District of Ohio, and now alleges that venue there was improper, violating his constitutional right to a trial in the “district wherein the crime shall have been committed.” U.S.Const. amend. VI. The district court denied the § 2255 motion, ruling that petitioner’s claim of improper venue is not cognizable in a habeas…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Johnston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. MobleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Lee WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. Burnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2003
  4. United States v. OsborneDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
  5. Alvarez-Cuan v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API