Legal Opinion
Mickelson v. Rosenberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 3, 1971No. 42553PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Justice.
Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for summary judgment. The questions decided were certified by the court below as important and doubtful within the meaning of Minn. St. 605.09 (i). Plaintiff has also filed a notice of review with respect to that portion of the order denying his motion for summary judgment.
On March 11, 1965, Northwestern Woolen Company petitioned the Hennepin County District Court for the appointment of a receiver. The company’s president and major stockholder was defendant, Sam Eosenberg. The court appointed plaintiff, J. J. Mickelson, as the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Liman v. United Kingdom Mutual Steamship Assurance Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Bank in Eden Valley v. Euerle Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Egge v. Healthspan Services Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000