Legal Opinion
Bruce v. Sibeck
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 13, 1938No. Civ. 5944PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
By this action the plaintiff sought by way of replevin to recover the possession of certain personal property which was seized by the defendants as game wardens of the state of California. The property in question was seized while the plaintiff was illegally operating a set line in violation of section 842 of the Fish and Game Code. The seizure was made at the time of the arrest of the plaintiff for violation of said section of the Fish and Game Code, by reason of his fishing in Clear Lake with a set line 855 feet in length. The property seized included: One Johnson outboard motor, model…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. . ChiaglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- United States v. MillsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1911
- People ex rel. Tamplin v. BeachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Santos v. DonderoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Silva v. MacAuleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Alain Scofield v. City of Hillsborough William A. Key, Chief of Police Thomas Musser, a Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- People v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. MacCagnanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.